Back to Blog
Breeds7 min read

Breed-Specific VHS Comparison Chart: Reference Values Across Popular Dog Breeds

By RadAnalyzer Team

1. Introduction

The Vertebral Heart Score (VHS) is one of the most widely used radiographic tools in veterinary cardiology, providing an objective method for assessing cardiac size on thoracic radiographs. While the original VHS reference range (mean ~9.7 ± 0.5 vertebrae) was developed for mixed-breed dogs, decades of research and clinical experience have shown that breed-specific anatomy significantly influences normal cardiac silhouette appearance. As a result, applying a single “one-size-fits-all” reference can lead to overdiagnosis or underdiagnosis of cardiomegaly in certain breeds.

Breed-specific VHS values exist because of differences in thoracic conformation, vertebral body length, chest depth, and skull type (e.g., brachycephalic vs. dolichocephalic). For example, brachycephalic breeds such as Bulldogs and Pugs naturally have higher VHS values due to barrel-shaped chests, whereas deep-chested breeds like German Shepherds and Doberman Pinschers often have lower or more elongated cardiac silhouettes.

Using the correct breed reference is critical for accurate clinical decision-making. Misinterpretation of VHS can result in unnecessary echocardiography, inappropriate initiation of cardiac medications, or missed early-stage heart disease. This is particularly important in breeds predisposed to specific cardiac conditions, such as myxomatous mitral valve disease (MMVD) in Cavalier King Charles Spaniels or dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) in Doberman Pinschers.

This comprehensive chart is designed as a practical clinical reference. Clinicians should use it alongside proper radiographic technique, consistent measurement methods, and correlation with physical examination and echocardiographic findings. The tables below summarize the most commonly cited breed-specific VHS values and available Vertebral Left Atrial Size (VLAS) references to support accurate and confident interpretation.


2. Complete VHS Reference Table

Breed Mean VHS SD 95% Range Notes
Mixed Breed / General 9.7 0.5 8.7–10.7 Standard reference
Cavalier King Charles Spaniel 10.6 0.5 9.6–11.6 Very high MMVD prevalence
Chihuahua 10.0 0.6 8.9–11.0 Apple-head conformation
Pug 11.25 0.62 10.1–12.8 Brachycephalic
French Bulldog 11.2 0.6 10.0–12.4 Brachycephalic
English Bulldog 12.0 0.7 10.6–13.4 Highest breed-specific
Boston Terrier 11.0 0.6 9.8–12.2 Brachycephalic
Boxer 11.6 0.8 10.0–13.2 High normal VHS
Dachshund 9.7 0.5 8.7–10.7 Similar to general
Maltese 9.53 0.46 8.6–10.5 Toy breed
Yorkshire Terrier 9.5 0.5 8.5–10.5 Toy breed
Pomeranian 10.4 0.5 9.4–11.4 Toy breed
Labrador Retriever 10.8 0.6 9.6–12.0 Large breed
German Shepherd 9.5 0.5 8.5–10.5 Deep-chested
Whippet 10.5 0.4 9.7–11.3 Sighthound
Greyhound 10.6 0.5 9.6–11.6 Sighthound
Doberman Pinscher 9.7 0.5 8.7–10.7 DCM concern
Golden Retriever 10.1 0.5 9.1–11.1 Large breed
Beagle 9.8 0.5 8.8–10.8 Standard
Border Terrier ~10.35 9.7–13.0 Wide range

3. Complete VLAS Reference Table

The Vertebral Left Atrial Size (VLAS) measurement is increasingly used to assess left atrial enlargement, particularly in dogs with suspected or confirmed MMVD. Unlike VHS, breed-specific VLAS data are more limited, but several clinically useful references exist.

Breed Mean VLAS SD Upper Reference Limit Notes
Mixed Breed / General 1.9 0.3 ≤ 2.3 Standard reference
Cavalier King Charles Spaniel 2.1 0.3 ≤ 2.5 Early LA enlargement common
Chihuahua 2.0 0.3 ≤ 2.4 Toy breed variability
Pug 2.2 0.4 ≤ 2.8 Brachycephalic
French Bulldog 2.3 0.4 ≤ 2.9 Limited data
Dachshund 1.9 0.3 ≤ 2.3 MMVD-prone
Maltese 1.9 0.3 ≤ 2.3 MMVD-prone
Yorkshire Terrier 2.0 0.3 ≤ 2.4 MMVD-prone
Pomeranian 2.1 0.3 ≤ 2.5 Toy breed
Labrador Retriever 1.9 0.3 ≤ 2.3 Large breed
Doberman Pinscher 1.8 0.3 ≤ 2.2 DCM focus

Note: For many breeds, VLAS interpretation should prioritize trend analysis and correlation with echocardiography rather than strict cutoffs.


4. How to Use This Reference

Finding Your Patient’s Breed

Begin by identifying whether your patient belongs to a breed with established VHS or VLAS data. If a specific reference exists, always prioritize it over the general mixed-breed range. This is especially important for brachycephalic and sighthound breeds, where normal values deviate substantially from the standard reference.

Mixed Breed Considerations

For mixed-breed dogs, assess overall thoracic conformation. A mixed dog with a deep chest and long limbs may align more closely with sighthound or shepherd-type references, while a compact, barrel-chested dog may resemble brachycephalic norms. In uncertain cases, the general VHS reference (9.7 ± 0.5) remains appropriate.

When to Use General vs. Breed-Specific Values

Use general references when:

  • No reliable breed-specific data exist
  • The dog is a complex mix with no dominant conformation
  • Radiographic positioning is suboptimal

Use breed-specific values when:

  • The breed is clearly identified
  • The patient belongs to a breed with known cardiac predispositions
  • VHS values fall near diagnostic decision thresholds

Interpreting Borderline Cases

Borderline VHS or VLAS values should never be interpreted in isolation. Consider:

  • Clinical signs (cough, exercise intolerance, murmur grade)
  • Serial radiographs for trend analysis
  • Echocardiographic confirmation when progression is suspected

A single mildly elevated measurement may represent normal anatomy rather than disease.


5. Breeds Without Specific Data

Despite extensive research, many breeds still lack validated VHS or VLAS reference ranges. In these cases, careful extrapolation and conservative interpretation are essential. Select comparison breeds with similar size, chest conformation, and skull type rather than relying solely on body weight.

When no suitable comparison exists, use the general reference range and place greater emphasis on longitudinal monitoring. Establishing an individual baseline in young or healthy adult dogs can be extremely valuable, allowing future measurements to be compared against that patient’s own normal rather than a population average.

Clinicians should also be cautious not to overinterpret mild increases in VHS in the absence of clinical or echocardiographic evidence of disease. When uncertainty remains, echocardiography remains the gold standard for definitive cardiac assessment.

As research continues, breed-specific reference ranges will expand. Until then, informed clinical judgment—supported by structured references like this chart—remains the cornerstone of accurate radiographic cardiac evaluation.


Individual Breed Guides

Related Resources

Community-Powered AI

Help build better veterinary AI tools

Submit anonymized clinical data through DataHub and earn rewards while advancing veterinary medicine.

Learn More